#Cubase elements 11 vs pro pro#
That said, when it comes to working with MIDI, samples, and virtual instruments: there’s everyone else, and then there’s Pro Tools. But Pro Tools is, without question, the industry standard for recording and editing audio sources (like a band, orchestra or any kind of live solo or ensemble work). Cubase (and the rest) can do this, and to be fair Steinberg has invested a lot into this side of Cubase. When it comes to recording and editing audio, there’s Pro Tools, and then there’s everyone else. These are both pro-level DAWs (with pro-level pricing) that are capable of producing music of the highest caliber, and they both work with top hardware solutions and a robust array of plugins, samples and virtual instruments.īut, like has been the case with other reviews in this series, there’s a massive difference in focus between the two DAWs. Both feature a horizontal workspace where your audio and MIDI tracks appear, and both can handle pretty much whatever you throw at them in terms of recording or working electronically. In the big picture, Pro Tools and Cubase look somewhat similar. Pro Tools vs Cubase: Big Picture Overview The real question isn’t which one is the best. Both are great pieces of software with their own strengths and weaknesses. Now, this isn’t exactly going to read like a “Pro Tools vs Cubase: the ultimate showdown” kind of review. Today, we’re rounding out the series with another well-known DAW: Cubase. In previous posts, we’ve already compared Pro Tools vs Logic Pro X, and we’ve also compared Pro Tools to Ableton Live and FL Studio. There are many players in the space, each with its own approach and extensive feature set.
Choosing the right DAW (digital audio workstation) for your home studio is an important first step, but it’s also a complicated one.
0 kommentar(er)
